“When a man (or woman) professes atheism, he immediately disqualifies himself to speak as a representative of science because his premise is a violation of the fundamental rule of science–“nothing created everything.””
Advertisements
“When a man (or woman) professes atheism, he immediately disqualifies himself to speak as a representative of science because his premise is a violation of the fundamental rule of science–“nothing created everything.””
Is this the same Ray Comfort that concluded that a banana was a convincing argument? Ha.
Indeed, it is. But regardless, I do still feel that this quote makes a valid point.
Not at all. All it does is indicate that Comfort has little to no understanding of science. Which would fit with everything we’ve seen of him in the past.
Oh, come now… how can everything come from nothing?